| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| week_4_questions_comments-325_25 [2025/09/18 09:16] – [Arthur McEvoy, "Working Environments"] 76.78.172.128 | week_4_questions_comments-325_25 [2025/09/18 10:59] (current) – [Document: Edison Bowers, "Is It Safe to Work?"] 73.99.248.106 |
|---|
| |
| Danly argued that the landscape art framed the peoples attitude and perspective on railroads in the 19th century. -Izzy Ellenberger | Danly argued that the landscape art framed the peoples attitude and perspective on railroads in the 19th century. -Izzy Ellenberger |
| | |
| | Danly's argument explains how humanity was stepping out of bounds of that world it once lived in where it was in harmony with nature. The railroad was the key to breaking that because it allowed men to expand further and faster than before, thus having a drastic impact on the natural ecosystem. Biggest and well known example is no doubt the decimation of the buffalo herds. - David Y. |
| | |
| | Danly's argument was more than just a subject of art as is severed as a cultural symbol, by showing the new technology and progress to the frontier and a national identity. - Will Crane |
| |
| === How were railroads represented in American art? === | === How were railroads represented in American art? === |
| |
| The railroads were represented as a transformation and relationship with both industrialization and nature. It also depicts expansion and technological change. -Izzy Ellenberger | The railroads were represented as a transformation and relationship with both industrialization and nature. It also depicts expansion and technological change. -Izzy Ellenberger |
| | |
| | The artwork in the earlier part showed a natural and near perfect blend of the railroad with the natural background, kinda like it was always there. Later works had shown some negative impacts that railroads were having to the land. - David Y. |
| |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| "Some employers will not make their plants safe because they fear that the expense involved will reduce profits." is the single quote here that stood out to me the most. In large part because in my own studies of major industrial accidents, this has been the primary cause. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire for example, is one of the largest industrial disasters in American history, and a large part of what went wrong that day was caused by inadequate safety measures and rules put in place by that factory owners. Similarly, the vast majority of nuclear accidents (of which i could talk for hours) are caused by faulty systems and a lack of consistent upkeep in accordance with code and regular safety conventions put in place by organizations like the NRC, simply because the upkeep is so expensive. As Callie said, capitalism strikes again. - Abby Firestone | "Some employers will not make their plants safe because they fear that the expense involved will reduce profits." is the single quote here that stood out to me the most. In large part because in my own studies of major industrial accidents, this has been the primary cause. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire for example, is one of the largest industrial disasters in American history, and a large part of what went wrong that day was caused by inadequate safety measures and rules put in place by that factory owners. Similarly, the vast majority of nuclear accidents (of which i could talk for hours) are caused by faulty systems and a lack of consistent upkeep in accordance with code and regular safety conventions put in place by organizations like the NRC, simply because the upkeep is so expensive. As Callie said, capitalism strikes again. - Abby Firestone |
| | |
| | Bowers showed in his document about how injuries could affect the work that could be provided, claiming that injuries can cost many years of manpower. The numbers he shared and the equivalent hours lost to injuries, along with some gruesome injuries, showed how bad injuries were and how unsafe they were. - David Y. |
| | |
| | Bower's explains the danger all this new technology caused in the railroads and factories. Many industrial fields with new technology was often unsafe and led to may deaths as working in these were unsafe. - Will Crane |
| | |
| |
| === How does this document relate to McEvoy's article? === | === How does this document relate to McEvoy's article? === |
| |
| Both McEvoy's article and Bower's arguments bring up significant safety concerns as they relate to increasing industrialization, particularly in a society that may not be truly prepared. Both authors also seem to feel that workplace injury is an inevitable fact of technological change. - Abby Firestone | Both McEvoy's article and Bower's arguments bring up significant safety concerns as they relate to increasing industrialization, particularly in a society that may not be truly prepared. Both authors also seem to feel that workplace injury is an inevitable fact of technological change. - Abby Firestone |
| | |
| | What I noticed in McEvoy's article is how technology had to adapt to the changing environment of nature around, and since human beings are part of that environment, they too had to adapt to better use this technology to better their lives. - David Y. |
| |
