User Tools

Site Tools


week_12_questions_comments-325_25

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
week_12_questions_comments-325_25 [2025/11/14 14:31] – [Document C -- Eberhart] 199.111.65.11week_12_questions_comments-325_25 [2025/11/14 14:32] (current) – [Document A -- Taylor] 199.111.65.11
Line 60: Line 60:
 This document was an interesting look at an antecedent to modern vibrators. George H. Taylor’s design seemed incredibly complicated and I’d imagine it would be quite large, which is interesting in comparison to modern vibrators that are now incredibly compact. - Noah Rutkowski This document was an interesting look at an antecedent to modern vibrators. George H. Taylor’s design seemed incredibly complicated and I’d imagine it would be quite large, which is interesting in comparison to modern vibrators that are now incredibly compact. - Noah Rutkowski
  
 +his document highlights how medical discourse provided a socially acceptable framework for technologies that were, in reality, about pleasure. The emphasis on “patients” and “treatment” turns what might otherwise seem immoral into something therapeutic, reflecting a broader cultural tension between faith, science, and sexuality. What I find most striking is how the language of cure disguised desire suggesting that pleasure itself was a condition to be managed rather than an experience to be understood. It’s a vivid example of how technology both mirrors and manipulates social values. - Todd Holman
  
 ===== Document B -- Snow =====  ===== Document B -- Snow ===== 
week_12_questions_comments-325_25.1763130682.txt.gz · Last modified: by 199.111.65.11