week_11_questions_comments-325_25
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| week_11_questions_comments-325_25 [2025/11/06 14:20] – [Advertising the Atom: Michael Smith] 76.78.172.65 | week_11_questions_comments-325_25 [2025/11/10 18:08] (current) – [Document A:US Congress, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Atomic Power Development and Private Enterprise] 199.111.65.11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| This passage looks at nuclear energy from a significantly more militaristic approach. Bringing focus to how these areas could be targets and the dangers associated with surrounding areas. Another way this strikes me is how the speaker mentions they’ve had good luck avoiding nuclear disaster but believes it is inevitable in time. - Justin Hoskins | This passage looks at nuclear energy from a significantly more militaristic approach. Bringing focus to how these areas could be targets and the dangers associated with surrounding areas. Another way this strikes me is how the speaker mentions they’ve had good luck avoiding nuclear disaster but believes it is inevitable in time. - Justin Hoskins | ||
| + | The reading discusses how the U.S. government aimed to promote private involvement in atomic energy while maintaining federal oversight. It emphasizes the effort to balance national security concerns with the goal of fostering innovation and economic growth through peaceful uses of nuclear power.-- Caitlyn Edwards | ||
| ====== Document B:US Congress, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Environmental Effects of Producing Electric Power, Hearings ====== | ====== Document B:US Congress, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Environmental Effects of Producing Electric Power, Hearings ====== | ||
week_11_questions_comments-325_25.1762438822.txt.gz · Last modified: by 76.78.172.65