Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 471g4:questions:471g4--week_2_day_1 [2021/08/31 11:18] – 76.78.225.150
+++ 471g4:questions:471g4--week_2_day_1 [2021/08/31 12:03] (current) – 75.75.52.120
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 . How did the public respond to the use of government money, taxes, to fund and operate public mental institutions? -- Jayden Jordan
+. Grob notes how "fear and optimism shaped the ways in which American's responded to social problems" however early public hospitals seemed to operate more in the way of financial motivation, had money been less of an issue would those suffering from mental illness truly have been cared for differently?
+. While early colonists believed that mental illness was the work of the devil, they did apply a community commitment to helping it, by the 1820s those who were ill were being kept in prison-like asylums.  Were the colonists, though ignorant and misguided, better and more humane at handling mental ill persons?
+-Janis Shurtleff
 .	Why did Cotton Mather, Grob (9-10), believe that madness was caused by the devil, yet believed in the efficacy of inoculating against smallpox? What was does this say about his opinion of the causes of insanity versus physical ailments?
@@ Line 52: / Line 57: @@
 -Submitted by Chris O'Neill
-.  In "Caring for the insane in Colonial America", we learned that those who were called "distracted" were considered the local town and community's 'responsibility.' Is this kind of solution/treatment good, or should we likely consider it tokenism?
+.", we learned that those who were called "distracted" were considered the local town and community's 'responsibility.' Is this kind of solution/treatment good, or should we likely consider it tokenism?
 . At what point is it irresponsible for family members of mentally ill people to insist on caring for them alone?