329:question:329--week_7_questions_comments
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
329:question:329--week_7_questions_comments [2016/10/13 14:06] – [3 Questions about interpretation] nmilroy | 329:question:329--week_7_questions_comments [2016/10/13 14:45] (current) – [4 Movie as a Primary Source about the time in which it was made] lfrey | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
====== 4 Movie as a Primary Source about the time in which it was made ====== | ====== 4 Movie as a Primary Source about the time in which it was made ====== | ||
- | This movie shows progression towards a more tolerant America, as some of the actors in the movie would have been old enough to participate in the Civil Rights movement. | + | **This movie shows progression towards a more tolerant America, as some of the actors in the movie would have been old enough to participate in the Civil Rights movement. |
- | I agree that this film shows how the United States had become more tolerant. Having this film accurately portray the will and heart of the African-Americans who fought, while acknowledging that they faced racism from Union soldiers, is a great way to honor and commemorate the actual 54th regiment and what they did in advancing the rights of other African-Americans to fight. --- // | + | I agree that this film shows how the United States had become more tolerant. |
- | I believe this movie is a primary source of its time because it showed PTSD caused by war. This was a common showing in movies after Vietnam, as it became more public to the United States that PTSD was a serious issue among soldiers. It also is a primary source for its time because of the amount of diversity. It was becoming more common for movies to involve more people of color, and this movie perfectly showcases that with the majority of its cast being black. --- // | + | I believe this movie is a **primary source of its time because it showed PTSD caused by war. This was a common showing in movies after Vietnam, as it became more public to the United States that PTSD was a serious issue among soldiers.** It also is a primary source for its time because of the amount of diversity. It was becoming more common for movies to involve more people of color, and this movie perfectly showcases that with the majority of its cast being black. --- // |
The movie showcases the diversity of African Americans throughout the nation rather effectively, | The movie showcases the diversity of African Americans throughout the nation rather effectively, | ||
- | Even though it was made in 1989, Glory was pretty progressive film and reflected changing racial attitudes in the United States. I grew up watching Glory every now and then, and the impression that I got from my family was that the film actually changed the landscape for African American actors in Hollywood. It also portrayed the African American characters in the film as complex human beings and as people who played an important part in changing history, instead of letting white characters take the lead. This helped to address decades of misrepresentation and/or underrepresentation in American film and to pave the way for future American history films focusing on African Americans. | + | Even though it was made in 1989, Glory was pretty progressive film and reflected changing racial attitudes in the United States. |
--- // | --- // | ||
--- // | --- // | ||
====== 5 Comparing the reading to the movie ====== | ====== 5 Comparing the reading to the movie ====== | ||
- | While watching the film, I didn’t think much of the burning of the town of Darien. I had assumed that that was probably a made-up or composite town and mission. But, this act and the controversy surrounding it is written about by James Henry Gooding, a member of the 54th, in On the Altar of Freedom. The people were upset not only because their small town was burned down but because of the fact that it was done by black soldiers. | + | **While watching the film, I didn’t think much of the burning of the town of Darien. I had assumed that that was probably a made-up or composite town and mission. But, this act and the controversy surrounding it is written about by James Henry Gooding, a member of the 54th, in On the Altar of Freedom. The people were upset not only because their small town was burned down but because of the fact that it was done by black soldiers.** --- // |
- | In the film, the 54th Massachusetts is shown protesting their wages. In the letter by James Henry Gooding, his 54th Massachusetts (which came later), also protested their wages, with Gooding writing to Abraham Lincoln directly. During the war, wages were 13 dollars for whites, and 10 dollars for blacks. In the pretext, it is written that Congress didn’t equalize pay until the tail end of the war. --- // | + | In the film, the 54th Massachusetts is shown protesting their wages. |
Certain aspects of the James Henry Gooding reading were shown in the film, such as his behavior towards the African Americans. | Certain aspects of the James Henry Gooding reading were shown in the film, such as his behavior towards the African Americans. | ||
- | I had read Susie King Taylor' | + | **I had read Susie King Taylor' |
====== 6 The "So, what?" question ====== | ====== 6 The "So, what?" question ====== | ||
- | So why make a movie? Well I think it is important in terms of the idea of how the Civil War is taught. To be completely honest, until high school, I was under the impression that the Civil War was mainly white men fighting other white men for the emancipation of slaves. It never actually occurred to me that other people other than white people fought in this war. That came out super racists and I apologize but that is the truth. In many high schools, we are given the white man’s history. The history of victory, not defeat and this part of history clearly shows not only how we interpret history but also how we portray it. Therefore, this movie is needed for people like me, who honestly fall into the trap of a white man’s victorious history. | + | So why make a movie? Well I think it is important in terms of the idea of how the Civil War is taught. |
Maggie, you are right and shouldn' | Maggie, you are right and shouldn' | ||
- | We don't get the view of the minority, Its good to get a different view than what is normally taught. Its also good to have a different perceptive of race and how it affected the blacks view of race, especially of the union (South slave owners sending in their slaves for them).The film proves to be a truly uplifting experience and an important history lesson, a valuable reminder that despite what the history books say (or, more precisely, what they do not say), blacks played a critically important role in the North' | + | We don't get the view of the minority, Its good to get a different view than what is normally taught. |
- | I believe that this is a very important movie about African-American struggle during the Civil War. As the three people above me have mentioned, the usual suspicion of Virginian-schooled kids is that the war was white vs white and the slaves just sat there waiting to be liberated. But they did so much more than that and this movie shows that. Even though that slaves sat and waited might be the usual assumption by people like me, I also would have said something like "yeah, ok that makes sense" if someone told me runaway slaves joined the Union army. But for the time, that idea would have been crazy to many northerners, | + | I believe that this is a very important movie about African-American struggle during the Civil War. **As the three people above me have mentioned, the usual suspicion of Virginian-schooled kids is that the war was white vs white and the slaves just sat there waiting to be liberated.** But they did so much more than that and this movie shows that. Even though that slaves sat and waited might be the usual assumption by people like me, I also would have said something like "yeah, ok that makes sense" if someone told me runaway slaves joined the Union army. But for the time, that idea would have been crazy to many northerners, |
- | I think this movie was significant in several ways. One was showing an important part of Civil War era history. Another was having a movie where the heroes don’t exactly prevail, but they show an immense amount of courage. My only problem with the movie is that at the end all of the white soldiers from various units seem willing and proud to serve with African Americans which wasn’t a reality. | + | I think this movie was significant in several ways. One was showing an important part of Civil War era history. |
- | When we watched the Patriot a few weeks ago, I asked what the point was in remaking a story about a war that happened centuries ago. This movie is one of the exceptions. Instead of repeating the story that we already know, this movie talks about a regiment that isn’t common knowledge and knowing about its existence is a vital part of understanding the true story of the Civil War. For so long, the history of the war was white washed, so understanding the complex nature of the war is critical to getting the full picture. Movies have the ability to convey a story that isn’t expressed in high school textbooks. | + | When we watched the Patriot a few weeks ago, I asked what the point was in remaking a story about a war that happened centuries ago. This movie is one of the exceptions. |
329/question/329--week_7_questions_comments.1476367614.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/10/13 14:06 by nmilroy