329:question:329--week_6_questions_comments-2020
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
329:question:329--week_6_questions_comments-2020 [2020/10/01 12:18] – 76.78.225.213 | 329:question:329--week_6_questions_comments-2020 [2020/10/01 13:20] (current) – [II.Problems with historical accuracy? Errors in fact?] janis_shurtleff | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Gone with the Wind presents a southern perspective that looks at the problems during and after the Civil War with romantic eyes for the southern gentry. With the arrival of general Sherman at Atlanta he is given no screen time but is rather presented as a force of evil as the screen is coated in flames as soldiers advance. Even the carpetbaggers are shown as a careless malevolent group as they arrive laughing and actively insult the southerners. The whole interpretation of the film plays the southern gentry as victims of the northerners in both language and presentation. The race relations presented in the film is by far the most egregious aspect as the slaves are a happy folk who stick with their masters. The film blatantly ignores the periods race relations while presenting horrible stereotypes. The film constantly presents the southern gentry of victims of northern oppression while ignoring the many factors that led to war as it rather presents the issue as a given occurrence of southern honor rather than being the result of any political or social interests. With the film’s focus on the upper classes it ignores many of the dynamics that are only hinted at with such characters as the slave driving having a mulatto child that died and finding financial success in the aftermath of the war. The plantation owner is presented as the primary example of the south. Rather than commenting on the ideas of the past the film perpetuates a romanticized view of the old south, counter to the historical record. -Robert Keitz | Gone with the Wind presents a southern perspective that looks at the problems during and after the Civil War with romantic eyes for the southern gentry. With the arrival of general Sherman at Atlanta he is given no screen time but is rather presented as a force of evil as the screen is coated in flames as soldiers advance. Even the carpetbaggers are shown as a careless malevolent group as they arrive laughing and actively insult the southerners. The whole interpretation of the film plays the southern gentry as victims of the northerners in both language and presentation. The race relations presented in the film is by far the most egregious aspect as the slaves are a happy folk who stick with their masters. The film blatantly ignores the periods race relations while presenting horrible stereotypes. The film constantly presents the southern gentry of victims of northern oppression while ignoring the many factors that led to war as it rather presents the issue as a given occurrence of southern honor rather than being the result of any political or social interests. With the film’s focus on the upper classes it ignores many of the dynamics that are only hinted at with such characters as the slave driving having a mulatto child that died and finding financial success in the aftermath of the war. The plantation owner is presented as the primary example of the south. Rather than commenting on the ideas of the past the film perpetuates a romanticized view of the old south, counter to the historical record. -Robert Keitz | ||
- | One issue I have with the accuracy of this film is the treatment of the enslaved peoples after the war. While Sherman or "The Great Invader" | + | One issue I have with the accuracy of this film is the treatment of the enslaved peoples after the war. While Sherman or "The Great Invader" |
This movie has several major historical inaccuracies. One problem that bothered me the most was the portrayal of enslaved African Americans and the concept of slavery itself. Slavery was glorified in the film and made out to be a better system than it was. Furthermore, | This movie has several major historical inaccuracies. One problem that bothered me the most was the portrayal of enslaved African Americans and the concept of slavery itself. Slavery was glorified in the film and made out to be a better system than it was. Furthermore, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The two female slave GWTW decided to depict were Mammy and Prissy. | ||
There were definitely a lot of problems with historical accuracy, and one of the most apparent problems was the portrayal of slavery. **It was portrayed as if slavery was not a horrific, torturous system; but one that helped African Americans and allowed them to live better than they had before.** I also think that some of Scarlett' | There were definitely a lot of problems with historical accuracy, and one of the most apparent problems was the portrayal of slavery. **It was portrayed as if slavery was not a horrific, torturous system; but one that helped African Americans and allowed them to live better than they had before.** I also think that some of Scarlett' | ||
Line 87: | Line 89: | ||
====== V. The "So, what?" question ====== | ====== V. The "So, what?" question ====== | ||
As we had talked about in class, this was how the topic of the Civil War was presented to Americans in 1939. Of course there are some things this movie does get correct, like the period clothing, the timeline of the war, and the devastating aftermath of the Civil War. But, there are some issues within the movie itself. There is recognition of these issues, and today there are warnings and disclaimers stating that. I feel like this might have been a decent movie in its time, but today there are many movies and documentaries that are much better representations of the Civil War, and slavery.- Kaylee Williams | As we had talked about in class, this was how the topic of the Civil War was presented to Americans in 1939. Of course there are some things this movie does get correct, like the period clothing, the timeline of the war, and the devastating aftermath of the Civil War. But, there are some issues within the movie itself. There is recognition of these issues, and today there are warnings and disclaimers stating that. I feel like this might have been a decent movie in its time, but today there are many movies and documentaries that are much better representations of the Civil War, and slavery.- Kaylee Williams | ||
+ | |||
+ | The fact that this film is essentially blatant Lost Cause propaganda means that we cannot ignore the historical fallacies of it. This film is incredibly important to the history of filmmaking and the history of the United States popular culture, and without it's advancements I do not think film would be the same. However, unlike previous films where the historical inaccuracies were a bit problematic, | ||
Gone With The Wind is one of the most successful movies in the history of American Cinema. | Gone With The Wind is one of the most successful movies in the history of American Cinema. |
329/question/329--week_6_questions_comments-2020.1601554703.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/10/01 12:18 by 76.78.225.213