Wiki for Dr. McClurkens Courses

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • 329--week_4_questions_comments • 329--week_13_questions_comments • 329--introduction_week_questions_comments_meme_posts-2024 • week_13_questions_comments-325_19
329:question:329--week_5_questions_comments-2024

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
329:question:329--week_5_questions_comments-2024 [2024/09/26 12:57] – [Problems with historical accuracy? Errors in fact?] 199.111.64.10329:question:329--week_5_questions_comments-2024 [2024/09/30 21:34] (current) – 76.78.172.116
Line 33: Line 33:
  
 I think that Amistad works very well as a secondary source. Maybe some viewers actually were led to believe the filmmakers got every single detail right, but for the most I would assume they know the filmmakers are going to take creative liberties. Even if they exaggerated the characters and scenes, it is still a very valuable film in bringing awareness to this compelling story. It may not have been able to capture all the complexities and brutality of what happened, but it gave the viewer some insight into what the slaves had to go through. Amistad was able to do that as well with detailed contexts and scenes to get a feel for what the atmosphere was like. One of the smaller details I noticed during one of the courtroom scenes was Cinque starting to sweat and even freak out during the session. This seemed to me signs of PTSD, most likely from all the white men around him, reminding him of the terrible things that he had to go through. Seeing that showed me that the makers of this film did give a lot of effort into trying to get the story right. While they weren’t perfect, overall Amistad is a great secondary source for people to have to introduce them to this part of history. -Matt S.  I think that Amistad works very well as a secondary source. Maybe some viewers actually were led to believe the filmmakers got every single detail right, but for the most I would assume they know the filmmakers are going to take creative liberties. Even if they exaggerated the characters and scenes, it is still a very valuable film in bringing awareness to this compelling story. It may not have been able to capture all the complexities and brutality of what happened, but it gave the viewer some insight into what the slaves had to go through. Amistad was able to do that as well with detailed contexts and scenes to get a feel for what the atmosphere was like. One of the smaller details I noticed during one of the courtroom scenes was Cinque starting to sweat and even freak out during the session. This seemed to me signs of PTSD, most likely from all the white men around him, reminding him of the terrible things that he had to go through. Seeing that showed me that the makers of this film did give a lot of effort into trying to get the story right. While they weren’t perfect, overall Amistad is a great secondary source for people to have to introduce them to this part of history. -Matt S. 
 +
 +I think that the Amistad movie portrayed a lot of the history accurately. Most of the characters were real and did things that the real character would have done. It also shined light on the court scenes that transpired after what had happened on the Amistad. I think that they did what they could, while taking some liberties to try and make the movie more exciting or interesting when they thought they had to. - Kazu Ferris 
  
  
Line 53: Line 55:
  
 Amistad seemed to me the most historically accurate films out of the ones we watched so far. That being said, it still had its inaccuracies and exaggerations. For starters, Cinque was shown in the movie as the strong leader who gave tons of hope and ideas of freedom to the rest of the people there with him. While this was partially true, it is known from accounts that his traits were exaggerated to portray him as one of if not the protagonist in the film. Another inaccuracy was Joadson, the character played by Morgan Freeman. Joadson was a fictional character used in the film. He was used to represent all the black abolitionists back when this happened. Furthermore, the way Spielberg showed their victory in court made it seem as though this was a major stepping stone in stopping slavery in the U.S. It was a big help in stopping the slave trade and giving help to the abolitionist movement. However, it didn't do anything in stopping slavery domestically. -Matt S. Amistad seemed to me the most historically accurate films out of the ones we watched so far. That being said, it still had its inaccuracies and exaggerations. For starters, Cinque was shown in the movie as the strong leader who gave tons of hope and ideas of freedom to the rest of the people there with him. While this was partially true, it is known from accounts that his traits were exaggerated to portray him as one of if not the protagonist in the film. Another inaccuracy was Joadson, the character played by Morgan Freeman. Joadson was a fictional character used in the film. He was used to represent all the black abolitionists back when this happened. Furthermore, the way Spielberg showed their victory in court made it seem as though this was a major stepping stone in stopping slavery in the U.S. It was a big help in stopping the slave trade and giving help to the abolitionist movement. However, it didn't do anything in stopping slavery domestically. -Matt S.
 +
 +The movie portrays Cinque as a sort of character that many people might have believed him to be. However, it is not known if he was truly like this or not. I am sure they did this to make the movie more entertaining in some way, but it is not truly historically accurate in this sense. -Kazu Ferris 
 +
  
  
Line 62: Line 67:
  
 Amistad seems to be a film that takes certain liberties pertaining to the facts of the events surrounding the case on which the movie is based, though whether or not these diversions from the truth are justified or not is a different matter. For instance, in the Tappan letter, the abolitionists states that the Africans had not been shackled (‘manacled’, as he puts it in archaic terms) since their being placed in American custody. However, throughout the movie, Spielberg depicts the Africans in chains and ragged clothing; a depiction that is contrary to Tappan’s firsthand account. That being said, I believe that this is an inaccuracy that is perfectly reasonable, and had a particular use for its inclusion. The utilization of chains provides a more striking visual representation for the lack of freedoms that the Africans had, making it all the more powerful for the audience when they are finally unshackled. An instance where certain historical liberties being taken might have been detrimental to the surrounding historical narrative comes from the film’s rather obvious utilization of the well-documented “white savior” trope. The film places an excessive emphasis on the fictionalized version of Baldwin. For instance, it portrays him as the one who reached out to John Quincy Adams, rather than the Africans themselves. This distortion of the facts of the case takes the initiative away from the Africans in freeing themselves - an initiative which they very much possessed and utilized. - John M. Amistad seems to be a film that takes certain liberties pertaining to the facts of the events surrounding the case on which the movie is based, though whether or not these diversions from the truth are justified or not is a different matter. For instance, in the Tappan letter, the abolitionists states that the Africans had not been shackled (‘manacled’, as he puts it in archaic terms) since their being placed in American custody. However, throughout the movie, Spielberg depicts the Africans in chains and ragged clothing; a depiction that is contrary to Tappan’s firsthand account. That being said, I believe that this is an inaccuracy that is perfectly reasonable, and had a particular use for its inclusion. The utilization of chains provides a more striking visual representation for the lack of freedoms that the Africans had, making it all the more powerful for the audience when they are finally unshackled. An instance where certain historical liberties being taken might have been detrimental to the surrounding historical narrative comes from the film’s rather obvious utilization of the well-documented “white savior” trope. The film places an excessive emphasis on the fictionalized version of Baldwin. For instance, it portrays him as the one who reached out to John Quincy Adams, rather than the Africans themselves. This distortion of the facts of the case takes the initiative away from the Africans in freeing themselves - an initiative which they very much possessed and utilized. - John M.
 +
  
 ====== How does this movie work as a primary source about the time in which it was made? ====== ====== How does this movie work as a primary source about the time in which it was made? ======
329/question/329--week_5_questions_comments-2024.1727355436.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/09/26 12:57 by 199.111.64.10