Wiki for Dr. McClurkens Courses

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • 329--introduction_week_questions_comments_meme_posts-2026
329:question:329--week_4_questions_comments-2026

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
329:question:329--week_4_questions_comments-2026 [2026/09/14 23:04] – [The "So What" Question -- Why should we care about the movie and its version of history?] 199.111.65.11329:question:329--week_4_questions_comments-2026 [2026/09/15 14:13] (current) – 199.111.65.11
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 ======How does the film’s overall interpretation(s) deviate from scholarly historical sources (as presented in class)?====== ======How does the film’s overall interpretation(s) deviate from scholarly historical sources (as presented in class)?======
 +
 +One major way that the film deviates from scholarly sources is the invention of several leading characters in the movie including Benjamin Martin and Colonel Tavington. The characteristics of Martin as a militia leader during the Southern Campaign match several real historical figures such as Francis Marion who was known to lead guerilla bands of rebel soldiers against the loyalists. The character of Colonel Tavington closely resembles the real historical figure of General Tarleton who led the British to brutally slaughter the patriots in the Battle of Waxhaw in 1780. However, some characters in the movie do have real historical basis like Lord Cornwallis and General Gates. -Kendall
  
  
Line 20: Line 22:
  
 The Patriot dates to a time period of particular American exceptionalism in media. The idea of “patriotic movies” has existed long before the year 2000, but in the wake of the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the sense of the United States being the world’s sole superpower renewed a sense of national patriotism, which would be strengthened even further by the 9/11 attacks after the film’s release. The Patriot taps into feelings of national pride from the period by telling its embellished version of the Revolutionary War, in which the colonists are clearly “the good guys,” and the British are clearly “the bad guys.” The lack of trying to make the British antagonists nuanced in their motivations to hold the colonies exemplifies this further; they appear almost cartoonishly evil at times. Overall, The Patriot leans into its patriotism particularly hard due to the period in which it was made, contributing to some of its issues in historical accuracy. - Hunter M. The Patriot dates to a time period of particular American exceptionalism in media. The idea of “patriotic movies” has existed long before the year 2000, but in the wake of the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the sense of the United States being the world’s sole superpower renewed a sense of national patriotism, which would be strengthened even further by the 9/11 attacks after the film’s release. The Patriot taps into feelings of national pride from the period by telling its embellished version of the Revolutionary War, in which the colonists are clearly “the good guys,” and the British are clearly “the bad guys.” The lack of trying to make the British antagonists nuanced in their motivations to hold the colonies exemplifies this further; they appear almost cartoonishly evil at times. Overall, The Patriot leans into its patriotism particularly hard due to the period in which it was made, contributing to some of its issues in historical accuracy. - Hunter M.
 +
 +This movie demonstrates the popular perception in the early 2000s about the American exceptionalism in the Revolutionary period. In the movie, the colonists, specifically the patriots, are shown to have higher moral standing than the loyalists and British. The patriots fight for their families and for the higher calling of independence like the Martins. Meanwhile the British fight for greed and with no moral integrity. By casting the British and loyalists as evil, the complexities of why people picked which side are thrown aside in favor of painting the rebels in a friendly light that would resonate with the viewers in 2000. -Kendall
 +
 ======The "So What" Question -- Why should we care about the movie and its version of history?====== ======The "So What" Question -- Why should we care about the movie and its version of history?======
 The Patriot is one of the few movies I would say historical inaccuracy does not matter that much, if you have knowledge of the American Revolution and can recognize the cartoonish characters. From my understanding, this movie was extremely popular which means it has left a massive impression on a wide audience. But the movie is basically one big action scene, all hinging on one guy’s revenge, with a cartoonishly evil British Officer. While there are definitely problematic representations in the movie, the movie is very obviously not accurate to history, nor is it trying to be. It's an action movie that so happens to be set in the 1790s. -Katie D. The Patriot is one of the few movies I would say historical inaccuracy does not matter that much, if you have knowledge of the American Revolution and can recognize the cartoonish characters. From my understanding, this movie was extremely popular which means it has left a massive impression on a wide audience. But the movie is basically one big action scene, all hinging on one guy’s revenge, with a cartoonishly evil British Officer. While there are definitely problematic representations in the movie, the movie is very obviously not accurate to history, nor is it trying to be. It's an action movie that so happens to be set in the 1790s. -Katie D.
329/question/329--week_4_questions_comments-2026.txt · Last modified: by 199.111.65.11