Wiki for Dr. McClurkens Courses

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • week_3_questions_comments-325_17 • week_2_questions_comments-325_19 • week_5_questions_comments-325_17 • week_12_questions_comments-325_19 • week_11_questions_comments-325_17 • week_13_questions_comments-325_17 • 329--week_10_questions_comments-2024 • week_9_questions_comments-325_19 • week_9_questions_comments-325_17 • week_2_questions_comments-325_25
329:question:329--week_12_questions_comments-2024

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
329:question:329--week_12_questions_comments-2024 [2024/11/14 03:42] – [The "So What" Question] 199.111.65.11329:question:329--week_12_questions_comments-2024 [2024/11/14 13:31] (current) – [How does this movie work as a secondary source? What does the movie get right about history?] 76.78.172.107
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 One thing that both the film and scholarly sources touch on was the amount of carpooling that took place over the course of that year. When learning about the boycotts in school, I was never taught this part of the boycott. What's interesting to me, and something that the film gets right, is that sometimes white women would offer to carpool African Americans who were participating in the boycott, which made their lives easier. The movie also touches on the fact that this practice was unfavorable. If a white woman was seen giving a black woman a ride, they were often ticketed for any excuse an officer could find. While the movie more so focuses on how Miriam faces opposition by her husband and other people she knows, rather than focusing as much on the ticketing, it still shows the outward feelings most white individuals had about this situation. - Emma Galvin  One thing that both the film and scholarly sources touch on was the amount of carpooling that took place over the course of that year. When learning about the boycotts in school, I was never taught this part of the boycott. What's interesting to me, and something that the film gets right, is that sometimes white women would offer to carpool African Americans who were participating in the boycott, which made their lives easier. The movie also touches on the fact that this practice was unfavorable. If a white woman was seen giving a black woman a ride, they were often ticketed for any excuse an officer could find. While the movie more so focuses on how Miriam faces opposition by her husband and other people she knows, rather than focusing as much on the ticketing, it still shows the outward feelings most white individuals had about this situation. - Emma Galvin 
 +
 +The Long Walk Home used some fictional characters/families, but it got the gist of what life was like back then. Their conversations were accurate, with just about every white person talking like they know better than anyone else (besides Miriam). Also, the viewer could see how hesitant black people were to say anything around whites back then, representing the fear that one small slip up could ruin their lives. The social customs were very accurate as well, as seen a lot in public spaces. For example, when Odessa was in the park and the cop made her leave, and how white people expected to be called sir or ma’am by blacks. The economic reality for blacks was evident in this film, shown in the poorer neighborhoods they lived in as well as the jobs they were working. Lots of blacks worked service or domestic jobs, which brings along the idea of the unfair balance in society and little opportunity that they had. The boycotting was portrayed accurately too, with lots of black people struggling more in their lives because of it, but still refusing to give up. The audience could see this through Odessa, where even when her feet would be bloodied and bruised she still wouldn’t take the bus. -Matt S. 
 +
 +Even though the characters that are depicted within the film are fictional, the film manages to capture the spirit of the  overall historical context of the era (the bus boycotts and its significance to the overall Civil Rights Movement). The film is accurate in its portrayal of the gender, race relations, and segregation present during this time. Similarly in its depiction of the boycott and the collective call to action it served for black people in their fight for equality.—Vumiliya Veriak 
 +
 +The movie while having a fictional plot line was able to accurately articulate the racial tension in Montgomery, Alabama during the 1950 boycotts. The aspects that the film tries to target is from the race, class, wealth, and even parenting perspective amongst our two protagonists in which they both differ because one serves as a maid and the other as a wife. The film was able to effectively illustrate the complexity in dynamics amongst the individuals' relationships amongst their respective families and the gradual shift in attitudes that were spurred by the boycotts. Rosa Park’s actions of getting arrested by the refusal to give up her bus seat shifted the attitude amongst southern Black Americans to peacefully protest against discrimination and to fight for a better future for American society. -Alex
 +
 +By capturing the racial tensions of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, *The Long Walk Home* functions as a useful secondary source. In addition to showcasing the unity within the Black community and the nuanced connections with white supporters, the film offers insight into the everyday problems, financial hardships, and personal sacrifices made by Black Americans through fictional characters. -Ryan K
    
 ====== Problems with historical accuracy? Errors in fact? ====== ====== Problems with historical accuracy? Errors in fact? ======
  
 The Long Walk Home takes some liberties with historical accuracy, especially in its portrayal of personal relationships and the extent of white support for the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Miriam Thompson, a white woman who risks social backlash to support her Black housekeeper, Odessa, represents a fictionalized ally figure. While some white residents sympathized with the boycott, the level of active support shown in the film was not common and overshadows the broader efforts of Black leaders and organizations like the Montgomery Improvement Association. Additionally, the film simplifies the boycott’s complexity, omitting some of the logistical challenges and legal battles faced by organizers. -Sam B. The Long Walk Home takes some liberties with historical accuracy, especially in its portrayal of personal relationships and the extent of white support for the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Miriam Thompson, a white woman who risks social backlash to support her Black housekeeper, Odessa, represents a fictionalized ally figure. While some white residents sympathized with the boycott, the level of active support shown in the film was not common and overshadows the broader efforts of Black leaders and organizations like the Montgomery Improvement Association. Additionally, the film simplifies the boycott’s complexity, omitting some of the logistical challenges and legal battles faced by organizers. -Sam B.
 +
 +The main “problem” with historical accuracy that this film had was that it used fictional characters. These characters were most definitely based in truth, but nevertheless, fictional. I think the primary reason that they chose to do this was to show the boycott from the perspective of an average citizen that was participating, rather than a political or civil rights leader like Dr. King or Rosa Parks which have plenty of movies made about their stories already. --Emma F.
 +
 +The film features fictional characters which may mislead viewers about the real individuals involved in the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Additionally, the timeline of events is sometimes condensed or altered for dramatic effect and the film's focus on the personal relationship between the two main characters which can overshadow the efforts of actual civil rights activists. Furthermore, it lacks exploration of the broader political context of the era including the roles of key organizations and figures like the NAACP and Martin Luther King Jr who was only mentioned twice in the movie.The film captures the spirit of the civil rights movement and doesn't really focus on the history, - jedidia Kazadi
 +
  
 ====== How does the film’s overall interpretation(s) deviate from scholarly historical sources? ====== ====== How does the film’s overall interpretation(s) deviate from scholarly historical sources? ======
  
 +This film does a very good job of portraying the basic facts accurate to the situation. At the time, a majority of the jobs Black women held were secretarial or housework jobs, this was portrayed accurately in the movie. However, something the movie didn't quite hit the mark on was the involvement of white women in the boycott. In one of the sources, it discusses the mutual boycott between the white women and their black maids. There was a form of alliance between the two groups, which wasn't necessarily expressed in the movie (at the beginning). Towards the end, that mutual respect was achieved, and I felt that it was done very well, but I felt that it downplayed the relationship a little. - Caty
  
  
Line 32: Line 46:
 This film works well as a primary source since the 1990s, during which the Long Walk Home was made, was a time when racial inequalities were still prominent.  The 1990's saw an increased focus on racial inequities. The film showcased an underrepresented voice along the side of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr., providing insight into what types of stories and viewpoints were becoming accepted in mainstream media at that time. Another thing is the growing women's rights movement. The 1990s saw more progress in women's rights. You can definitely see this when Mariam was struggling against her husband's wishes; if the movie was produced in the 1950s, the scenario would be different. (Hannah E.)  This film works well as a primary source since the 1990s, during which the Long Walk Home was made, was a time when racial inequalities were still prominent.  The 1990's saw an increased focus on racial inequities. The film showcased an underrepresented voice along the side of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr., providing insight into what types of stories and viewpoints were becoming accepted in mainstream media at that time. Another thing is the growing women's rights movement. The 1990s saw more progress in women's rights. You can definitely see this when Mariam was struggling against her husband's wishes; if the movie was produced in the 1950s, the scenario would be different. (Hannah E.) 
    
 +The Long Walk Home serves as a primary source about the time in which it was made, late 1980s to 1990, in ways that echo other films we’ve discussed from around that same time period. This movie definitely represents the societal push for more diverse stories told on-screen. As my classmates have pointed out, this movie does make some great strides in historical accuracy and approaching sensitive topics with care, which does show how the people (generally speaking) of this era looked back upon the Civil Rights Movements of the 1950s and 1960s. However, it’s not perfect and the movie, at times, used the struggles of African Americans with segregation and racism as a tool for the white protagonist’s character arc. I think this shows that, despite good intentions, Hollywood and the general American audience had a lot of room to grow. --Allie
  
  
Line 47: Line 61:
  
 In school, when learning about the Bus Boycotts, we usually learned about Rosa Parks and her first encounter that got her imprisoned. We then learned that a boycott was put into effect and then a year later the boycott ended due to bus segregation being ruled unconstitutional. We never really learned about what happened between point A and point B. While this movie isn’t 100% accurate, it highlights more of the Bus Boycott than I ever learned and it also gives a white person's perspective of the whole event, which is also something I was never taught growing up. Assuming most people around my age grew up with similar knowledge of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, this movie is a great way to introduce that subject and teach more about an important event in American history that isn’t talked about in much depth. - Emma Galvin  In school, when learning about the Bus Boycotts, we usually learned about Rosa Parks and her first encounter that got her imprisoned. We then learned that a boycott was put into effect and then a year later the boycott ended due to bus segregation being ruled unconstitutional. We never really learned about what happened between point A and point B. While this movie isn’t 100% accurate, it highlights more of the Bus Boycott than I ever learned and it also gives a white person's perspective of the whole event, which is also something I was never taught growing up. Assuming most people around my age grew up with similar knowledge of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, this movie is a great way to introduce that subject and teach more about an important event in American history that isn’t talked about in much depth. - Emma Galvin 
 +
 +Everyone learns about Rosa Parks in US history class (this one is no different). However, this movie shows something that mainstream history does not - the everyday lived experience of Black individuals during that time. We learn about the big names, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, and even James Farmer, but people like Odessa and even Miriam to some degree aren't talked about. The everyday instances of racism, the lived experiences, and the struggles that black people went through during not just the Civil Rights movement but the time before and after that are expressed in this movie. It's important to acknowledge that, to feel upset by it, to know that it happened so it never happens again. Though there are areas of improvement in this film, I still think it does an excellent job showing what other movies don't. - Caty
 +
 +
 +the movie is important for its exploration of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the civil rights movement. The movie highlights the personal sacrifices and moral choices that individuals make in the fight against racism. the film illustrates the potential for empathy and understanding across racial and class divides while emphasizing the impact of nonviolent resistance. the Film also shows how woman both black and white where treated at this.By showcasing the struggles and resilience of women in the movement, the film serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing fight for social justice, - Jedidia Kazadi
 +
 +I think a big impact of this movie is the focus on ordinary people. So many times we see a movie about social change that uses large organizations, the government, etc. as ways to enact change. While neither of those examples are bad, a film like “The Long Walk Home” can remind people of the importance of local community and grassroots campaigns; in this case, pertaining to the Montgomery bus boycotts. This time of year has felt more political than normal, due to Presidential election (of course), and watching a movie like this reminded me (and others) that there are ways for everyday citizens to work together for a common purpose.   --Allie
 +
 +The Long Walk Home is an important movie because of how it shed lights on some things that might not have been taught to people. Many of us have learned about Martin Luther King Jr. and other leaders of the Civil Rights movement. However, it hit me harder seeing the everyday emotional struggle that ordinary people had to go through. Seeing how deep segregation went was eye-opening, that it affected almost every aspect of black people’s lives in that town. I think this film not only gives its audience a deep respect and understanding for civil rights, but also places importance on what each individual did back then to fight for equality. -Matt S. 
 +
 +I think it was really important to show how difficult this boycott was for the average African-American worker at that time and how much of a toll it took on them, not just physically, but mentally as well. Schools tend to talk a lot about the leaders of movements like these but not so much how it impacted people who were maintaining their jobs and somewhat normal lives throughout this. The other really important aspect of this movie was its raw depiction of racism and all of the different forms it could take. The extensive use of the n word was necessary to do this, as it was common practice for the time. This applies to the different violent scenes as well. --Emma F.
 +
 +When learning about the Montgomery Bus Boycott, more often than not, the focus is primarily on the larger, overall significant events that occurred during this time or specific organizations that were prominent within the Civil Rights Movement. The Long Walk Home sheds light on the personal and everyday life of people amidst the events of the boycott and how they were affected. The films use of fictional characters, such as Miriam and Odessa, doesn't necessarily hurt its narrative due to the fact that it gives the film the opportunity to tell a story of the interplay of race and gender, and the struggle to overcome that, during this time that many would have potentially related to.—Vumiliya Veriak 
 +
 +The reason why we should care about this movie is that it serves as an educational tool of the events that transpired from our past regarding the racial divide in our country. The discrimination against racial and social classes were prominent issues that dominated the American south that tried to get brushed to the side and ignored by those who saw no wrong in the disillusioned life they were living. Individuals such as Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr for example sought out a different means to bring these issues into light without resorting to violent acts. Peacefully protesting was one of the strongest demonstrations of the first amendment by the right to peaceably assemble in the pursuit of civil liberties amongst Black Americans. This mass effort was to ensure a hope for a new beginning in our American society that moves away from the hatred of its unjust past. -Alex
 +
 +The Long Walk Home is significant because it highlights the sacrifices made by common people during the Montgomery Bus Boycott, demonstrating how the Civil Rights Movement was fueled by local community action. In contrast to stories about well-known figures, this movie highlights the tenacity and daily challenges of Black people—particularly women—who overcame social and economic adversity in order to bring about change. It also emphasizes how the movement's effect was influenced by empathy and support that cut beyond racial boundaries. -Ryan K
 +
  
329/question/329--week_12_questions_comments-2024.1731555778.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/11/14 03:42 by 199.111.65.11