329:question:329--week_11_questions_comments-2026
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| 329:question:329--week_11_questions_comments-2026 [2026/11/11 07:37] – 76.78.172.49 | 329:question:329--week_11_questions_comments-2026 [2026/11/11 07:39] (current) – [The "So What" Question -- Why should we care about the movie and its version of history?] 76.78.172.49 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| This movie is unique compared to other movies we have watched because it was released in 1946 and is set after the end of World War II in 1946. This sets it up to be an excellent primary source about the post World War II era as the creators of the movie were setting the scene of very current and real issues. Fears about financial burden, changing family dynamics, and the struggle to adjust to post-war life are effectively demonstrated in the movie as real contemporary issues to the time. -Kendall B. | This movie is unique compared to other movies we have watched because it was released in 1946 and is set after the end of World War II in 1946. This sets it up to be an excellent primary source about the post World War II era as the creators of the movie were setting the scene of very current and real issues. Fears about financial burden, changing family dynamics, and the struggle to adjust to post-war life are effectively demonstrated in the movie as real contemporary issues to the time. -Kendall B. | ||
| ======The "So What" Question -- Why should we care about the movie and its version of history? | ======The "So What" Question -- Why should we care about the movie and its version of history? | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a 2020 interview with AFI Movie Club, American director, producer, actor, and World War II veteran Mel Brooks called The Best Years of Our Lives a “healing picture.” Brooks asserts that the movie perfectly captured what America was feeling after having experienced the “catastrophe” that the country had just endured during World War II. He called it healing because it explored all of the challenges that everyone from the soldier, to the girl left behind, to helpless-feeling families found themselves facing after the war and taught them how to make “peace with the world, in our souls, and with each other.” This is the value he sees in this movie, and I agree that it is why we should care about it. - Charles Salcedo | ||
| This movie so intimately and accurately shows the often-forgotten story of what happens next after war. Throughout the war, Americans were being fed very pro-American material to encourage the nation to hold fast in their support on both the home and war front. That is juxtaposed with this film where not everything is happy go lucky, it confronts the harsh and unpredictable reality of the nation in 1946. A very interesting question that I think this movie poses is what do we do with a population that has seen so many horrors and integrate them back into a population who has not gone through such things? While many movies cover the contemporary moment, this movie is unique because it seems to understand the importance of the time. It doesn’t sugar coat the issues and covers factors that would end up being very important for the post-war period, including the effects of the GI bill, the soon-to-come baby boom, the effects that war would take on the large veteran population, as well as the fear of new atomic weapons. We should care because this movie shows what it was like to live a typical messy human life after WWII and we should be grateful we have this artifact of the time. – Nora M. | This movie so intimately and accurately shows the often-forgotten story of what happens next after war. Throughout the war, Americans were being fed very pro-American material to encourage the nation to hold fast in their support on both the home and war front. That is juxtaposed with this film where not everything is happy go lucky, it confronts the harsh and unpredictable reality of the nation in 1946. A very interesting question that I think this movie poses is what do we do with a population that has seen so many horrors and integrate them back into a population who has not gone through such things? While many movies cover the contemporary moment, this movie is unique because it seems to understand the importance of the time. It doesn’t sugar coat the issues and covers factors that would end up being very important for the post-war period, including the effects of the GI bill, the soon-to-come baby boom, the effects that war would take on the large veteran population, as well as the fear of new atomic weapons. We should care because this movie shows what it was like to live a typical messy human life after WWII and we should be grateful we have this artifact of the time. – Nora M. | ||
329/question/329--week_11_questions_comments-2026.1794382677.txt.gz · Last modified: by 76.78.172.49
