329:question:329--week_11_questions_comments-2020

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
329:question:329--week_11_questions_comments-2020 [2020/11/05 12:54] – [I.How does this movie work as a secondary source? What does the movie get right about history?] 73.40.104.245329:question:329--week_11_questions_comments-2020 [2020/11/05 14:08] (current) – [I.How does this movie work as a secondary source? What does the movie get right about history?] 72.43.62.101
Line 40: Line 40:
  
  
-I think an interesting discussion to have could center around weather or not this film really can even be considered a secondary source. Its written when it was made, and while some of it is an outside interpretation of other people's experiences, it still gives their perspective on their own time. Thus, I would argue that it cannot be considered a secondary source at all. Since it is interpreting it's own time, the film by it's very nature is just one type of primary source, not a secondary one. -Ethan+**I think an interesting discussion to have could center around weather or not this film really can even be considered a secondary source.** Its written when it was made, and while some of it is an outside interpretation of other people's experiences, it still gives their perspective on their own time. Thus, I would argue that it cannot be considered a secondary source at all. **Since it is interpreting it's own time, the film by it's very nature is just one type of primary source, not a secondary one**. -Ethan
 ====== II. Problems with historical accuracy? Errors in fact? ====== ====== II. Problems with historical accuracy? Errors in fact? ======
  
329/question/329--week_11_questions_comments-2020.1604580883.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/11/05 12:54 by 73.40.104.245