325:questions:week_4_questions_comments-325_17
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
325:questions:week_4_questions_comments-325_17 [2017/02/09 14:15] – [Arthur McEvoy, Working Environments] jmcclurken | 325:questions:week_4_questions_comments-325_17 [2019/09/17 16:45] (current) – 192.65.245.89 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Railroad companies used art to appeal to customers. This resulted in Railroads being represented as opportunities to leisurely enjoy the views of America in person, instead of just through art. Railroads were represented as a way to " | Railroad companies used art to appeal to customers. This resulted in Railroads being represented as opportunities to leisurely enjoy the views of America in person, instead of just through art. Railroads were represented as a way to " | ||
+ | Railroads as depicted in american art, most notably John Gast's painting //American Progress//, depicts railroads as part of the american movement to expand the country and to explore. This ideal was found primarily in the idea of manifest destiny that was a driving factor in much of the western settlements. It was also an ideal that would lead to the American Dream ideal that inspired many people to come to America in pursuit of their fortune. Thomas Lanier | ||
The railroad was a new an exciting technology that changed the way urbanization occurred in America. The railroad brought the cities to the farms and vice versa.There was a slow flux of product and goods come and going from country to city. Their appearance in art was similar. It was a change that slowly occurred in art work. Subtle changes such as a change in landscape, from rolling hills to a flat horizon. This was seen in America to make grounds for the rails to be laid. Then there was the addition of one railway with white smoke trailing behind it. The train would be small in comparison to the entire picture, it was there but it wasn’t the main focus. As the railway increased in America, so did its appearance in art. --- // | The railroad was a new an exciting technology that changed the way urbanization occurred in America. The railroad brought the cities to the farms and vice versa.There was a slow flux of product and goods come and going from country to city. Their appearance in art was similar. It was a change that slowly occurred in art work. Subtle changes such as a change in landscape, from rolling hills to a flat horizon. This was seen in America to make grounds for the rails to be laid. Then there was the addition of one railway with white smoke trailing behind it. The train would be small in comparison to the entire picture, it was there but it wasn’t the main focus. As the railway increased in America, so did its appearance in art. --- // | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
I found it particularly interesting that Danly discussed the romanticized attitude toward the railroad was a reflection of the period' | I found it particularly interesting that Danly discussed the romanticized attitude toward the railroad was a reflection of the period' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The way that trains and railroads were romanticized in art makes it even more clear that Americans thought of the railroad as something as American as the American landscape. The contrast between the hardness of this “iron horse” and the way it is depicted as a soft creature that blends in with the landscape is interesting and obviously intentional. Figure 12 with the rainbow above the train chugging along while cows graze leisurely embodies this ideology perfectly. I’d never thought of the railroads impact on art, but the art clearly shows that the railroad permeated every aspect of American life. --Anna Collins | ||
===== Arthur McEvoy, " | ===== Arthur McEvoy, " | ||
**McEvoy makes an interesting comparison between the human body and ecological systems.** However, I thought his comparison of " | **McEvoy makes an interesting comparison between the human body and ecological systems.** However, I thought his comparison of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think that the connection that McEvoy makes between the effect that industrialization has not only on the physical environment, | ||
I found it interesting how McEvoy compared nature and workers as “close cousins working on opposite sides of the factory gate:” (81) He follows up his statement saying “one destroys the productivity of air, water, and other natural systems, while the other destroys a human body’s biological capacity to work.” (81) I never would’ve thought about these two parts of industry to go hand in hand with each other because just as the argument McEvoy was making, it’s usually overlooked and both parts (nature and workers) are interchangeable just like the machines that they are being used for. – Jessie Cavolt | I found it interesting how McEvoy compared nature and workers as “close cousins working on opposite sides of the factory gate:” (81) He follows up his statement saying “one destroys the productivity of air, water, and other natural systems, while the other destroys a human body’s biological capacity to work.” (81) I never would’ve thought about these two parts of industry to go hand in hand with each other because just as the argument McEvoy was making, it’s usually overlooked and both parts (nature and workers) are interchangeable just like the machines that they are being used for. – Jessie Cavolt |
325/questions/week_4_questions_comments-325_17.1486649707.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/02/09 14:15 by jmcclurken