As we have discussed in class, an audience is key to a successful web site because if no one visits the site then there is not much of a point in making it. When I stated to think about building an audience I thought about how I am part of the audience of the sites I visit. When I enter a site it is usually from a link or from the results of me googling a certain term. Occasionally I hear about a site from other people or via social media such as Facebook. I tend to use sites that are organized and easy to navigate. Keeping my personal interaction with the internet in mind I think that creating a digital project that uses frequently searched terms and using social media to spread the word that the web site exists will ensure its success. For our Civil War diaries project we are planning to make a site that is easy to navigate whether you enter from the main screen or a specific dairy page. Since we are working mostly with primary sources it is important that we make the site easy to follow and not too complicated so the visitor can find what they are looking for. My group and I believe our main audience for the site will be scholars and educators that will use it for academic and educational proposes. We anticipate that many other people will visit our site such as people interested in the Civil War and visitors to the National Park Service. The main goal for our website is to educate our visitors about Steven Gordon and the importance of primary sources.
I thought both the Timeline and StoryMap tools were very easy to use because they both gave clear directions. I never used StoryMap JS before but I used Google Maps in my History 298 class. These two maps tools are very similar as far as the content you can enter but in my opinion the display of StoryMap is clearer. The map I created shows the places I went on a study abroad trip two summers ago. All of the pictures are ones I took on the trip.
I have used Timeline JS before in my History 298 class and think it is a great way to display dates visually. Since I am both a History and Art History major, I particularly like that images and media can be add to clarify what happen on that date. I used the UMW timeline template from google docs and I thought it worked well. The only problem that I had was that if I want something in italics it does not show up in italics. The timeline I created for this project is a timeline of my work experience and education. For our Civil War soldier diary project it would be nice to have a timeline of events or even a timeline of particular entries that are of significance.
I setup an account on Freedly and subscribed to my classmates sites as well as the blogs of Katherine D. Harris and Amanda L. French.
For this blog assignment, I decided to use the same information for both the map as well as the timeline. Last semester, I wrote my Senior Thesis on a Major League Baseball pitcher by the name of Dock Ellis. The basis of my argument was correlating him to the counterculture movement of the 1960s. I figured this would be a good topic for this assignment because obviously the length of an athlete’s career is finite which gives a good window to graph since it has a clear beginning and end.
I did have some trouble embedding both the map and the timeline into this post. I Googled some things and discovered that I needed a WordPress plugin named “iFrame” which enables WordPress to embed using a “shortcode” (at least that is how I interpreted it). Eventually I got it to work but there are still some things that I would like to change but I am just not exactly sure how. These changes, such as extending the bottom of the map so the text from the post does not cover up the “StoryMapJS” information at the bottom, are just minor tweaks so I am not too worried about them.
Both the map and the timeline contain the same basic information but the manner in which this information is communicated slightly changes the interpretation. The timeline does a good job of laying out the basics: when he played, who he played for during certain years, and other major events in his career such as the All Star Game and the LSD No-Hitter. The map on the other hand, while still conveying this same information, allows for a more visual experience in which the viewer can see the location of the events change. I do like the option of the timeline to include videos which I think for oral historians especially, would prove invaluable.
Personally, I prefer the timeline to the map. While making the map, the presentation of the information was clean and easy to read. However, after embedding it, the map becomes smushed together and as a result, loses some functionality and readability. For my project on the Civil War diary, I think the timeline would be the most beneficial since the change of location would probably be rare. I could possibly use each slide as a separate diary entry, have a picture of the scanned page of the diary, and then have the transcription in the text box.
1) Some creative uses of the tools we’ve learned about so far. [e.g., how might you use Zotero for something other than citation/research? What could a WordPress blog be used for other than personal reflection? What creative ways can you think of to use Omeka? How might you use these tools in combination with each other or with others you’ve used outside of class. [Be playful with your ideas here.]]
A good use for Zotero that I have found is that it is easy to share your research and your citations by exporting and importing them. I think this function could serve well on a project’s cite by including the download link of the citations you have accumulated during your research. Obviously, this feature would not replace a “Bibliography” or “Works Cited” page but it could contribute to a more interactive experience as well as allow visitors and other historians to easily access your citations if they use Zotero.
Besides personal reflection in a typical blog like manner, WordPress can be used as a form of an electronic portfolio or resume. It can be used as a single place in which an employer or school admission office can view the projects you have contributed to or writing samples you have written.
Omeka is still a very novel tool to me but I think it lends itself to a more interactive experience which contributes to projects that include more visual items or interactive maps or timelines.
These tools combined can cleanly and effectively layout a portfolio, complete with download links for your Zotero library or a timeline of a college career with works from each year in order to show the progress you have made throughout that timespan.
2) Based on your review of the Digital History websites above: Think about what you like about these websites as a whole, and what you don’t. What works and what doesn’t? What elements would you want to incorporate and which do you want to avoid in your own project?
Links to Example Websites I used
Good Things: I like how the initial homepage gives a brief introduction of the whole website before you get into the meat of it all. Also, by clicking a link in order to “enter” the website, it gives the feeling of entering a museum or an exhibit which is a hard thing to capture with a website.
Bad Things: I do not at all like the layout of the navigation page. It is a cluttered web of links that is difficult to read and is hard to focus on what exactly you are clicking on and what you are going to get with each click.
Things I would Incorporate: I would definitely incorporate the home page and its role as a gateway to the website as a whole.
Good Things: I really like the “Explore the City” feature and the “Interactive Map” that accompanied it. Being able to click on a building and getting a little bit of history about each one is really cool. The side bar next to the map does a good job of categorizing the buildings based on their function and highlights the corresponding building of buildings depending on what you clicked on.
Bad Things: I am not a big fan of the color scheme used. The brown is too in-your-face and the gold color for the font, although it contrasts well with the brown, is a bit too gimmicky in my opinion.
Things I would Incorporate: Although I would love to incorporate an interactive map of some sort, I am not sure my project caters too much to that and I do not think I have the time nor the technological prowess to accomplish something like this.
Good Things: I enjoyed the interactive timeline on the homepage and how the background images on the timeline corresponded to events that were prominent during the time periods that are presented. I also liked the presentation of the subsections below the map. It is spaced very well and lays out in a logical order topics or eras.
Bad Things: The layout of the timeline could be improved upon. Most notably, the font on the y-axis is hard to read because it crunches the font and forces the reader to tilt their head in order to read it.
Things I would Incorporate: I would incorporate the cleanliness of the subsection and its logical manner of laying out the topics and links.
Good Things: I really, really likes the overall layout of this site and I think it can serve as an excellent example for the diary project I am working on. The transcribed text directly next to an image of the actual diary page which can be clicked on and enlarged is perfect. At the top, the numbers are a clean way of showing the page numbers as well as the corresponding dates associated with each diary entry. The search function is also really good and is something that I toyed around with a little to test its functionality. The annotations that are scattered throughout the diary entries also give additional insight into names, dates, etc.
Bad Things: I would personally improve upon the “About this Site” section. The section is a too small for the necessary information for the rest of the site and the only way to expand it is to click the “Read More” link at the end of the paragraph. I think a menu heading detailing more what the project is about would be invaluable.
Things I would Incorporate: I will 100% incorporate the manner in which the transcribed diary entries accompany the actual diary entries and the “Annotations” function used to clarify and expand upon items presented in the entries.
Good Things: I liked the graphic that accompanied scrolling over the various pictures or menu headings. It gives it a cool feeling and does a better job than just immediately giving whatever you are scrolling over a contrasting background.
Bad Things: This site has a lot wrong with it in my opinion. It takes way too long to load anything even on a top tier desktop. The large map on the homepage does not really serve a purpose. It was the first thing I clicked on when I got to the site. Not only did it stall up my computer for a second, but there is not function of it. The only thing clicking on it does is enlarge the picture but even after that, it is still difficult to read any of the details of the picture. In order to fully read it, you have to open it in another window in order to zoom in on it. This is not something the average computer user will know how to do. I also do not link the font used, both the color and the size. The light gray coupled with the small font makes it extremely difficult and strenuous to read.
Things I would Incorporate: I would like to incorporate the effect that came with scrolling over objects.
Jan. 13, 2016
Hello! My name is James Stewart. I am a junior Art History and History double major and Museum Studies minor. I wanted to take Digital History because I want to learn about how history can be interpreted online. I plan to pursue a career as a museum curator or collections manager and both of those positions use digital media to discuss history and objects related to the historical narrative. This class also interests me because we get to work on a project that can be used as a example of our skills to future colleagues and employers. I am also taking this class because it fulfills one of the seminar classes for the history major. I think this class will be helpful as well as very interesting and I am looking forward to a great semester!